tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2611021408437270881.post4818596319882536236..comments2024-03-18T23:59:39.885-07:00Comments on Skeptical CPA: Naive Professors?Independent Accountanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07800220849565219709noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2611021408437270881.post-8774875651135587672008-12-17T15:39:00.000-08:002008-12-17T15:39:00.000-08:00Hello i.a.Ben Bernanke looks unassuming but he and...Hello i.a.<BR/><BR/>Ben Bernanke looks unassuming but he and Paulson are the two biggest crooks the world has ever seen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2611021408437270881.post-14253196746609828602008-12-17T12:02:00.000-08:002008-12-17T12:02:00.000-08:00The fallacy in the majority of what you have quote...The fallacy in the majority of what you have quoted here is the assumption that there is such a thing as 'the government' -- there isn't. 'the government' was taken over by big businesses, and wall st. in particular sometime ago. <BR/><BR/>Thus we see, as with the bush tax cuts, every problem that arises turns out to have the same 'culprit' -- 'the government'. <BR/><BR/>The WSJ would love for us to start thinking that *anything* they publish is worthy of anything other than derision. The WSJ is desperate for us to forget that it is precisely the policies *they* have advocated for vociferously, and often viciously, that are precisely the cause of the problems we are having.<BR/><BR/>Only in fantasy land america, can 30 years of blaming government not be responsible for a breakdown in government regulation. Only in fantasy land america can people who have pushed, publicly and endlessly for control, and upon gaining control oversee the collaps of the US economy NOT be held responsible for what they have wrought.<BR/><BR/>Nothing will get better in this country until the lies that have created the problem are recognized.<BR/><BR/>Nothing.<BR/><BR/>The first article quoted is startling for it's self serving duplicity. Startling not because we haven't see it before, but because the world view it represents is so obviously insane. 'Economists lost their principles' huh? Don't worry, the person writing that article lost theirs long before. This era is the era of no principles, that apparently had escaped the notice of our insightful article writer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2611021408437270881.post-6926289580367672732008-12-17T11:26:00.000-08:002008-12-17T11:26:00.000-08:00“the basic political arangement has to change” I w...“the basic political arangement has to change”<BR/> I would guess many, but probably not a majority, would agree with this; the question is how. MR seems to pedal the same “government bad, market good” story that has served as a cover for the current “political arrangement” to enrich and empower itself. And his “revolution” amounts to money going, by the magic of market, to “healthy” enterprises. I would like to see a list of those… Not very enlightening… As for revolutions, read true practitioner, not their misguided biographers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2611021408437270881.post-74410363438606611902008-12-17T10:44:00.000-08:002008-12-17T10:44:00.000-08:00Reordering the moneyscape is a big thing ...More n...Reordering the moneyscape is a big thing ...<BR/><BR/>More new ideas... yesx10!<BR/><BR/>I think the Cenbank/Treas magic act be wearing thin...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com