Showing posts with label Other. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Other. Show all posts

Sunday, June 20, 2010

IA Short-Sells Dollar!

Recently I short-sold the dollar for 30 years. In lieu of a good fath deposit with a commodities dealer, I made a down payment on a house "purchase". In the US a good way to issue long-term fixed-rate debt is to "buy" a house. So I did. WC Varones, I salute you, see WCV's 12 January 2010 post:
http://www.wcvarones.com/2010/01/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love.html. Houston real estate is cheap compared to that in Los Angeles. I estimate my house would have cost 4X as much if in say Woodland Hills, CA, about 25 miles northwest of downtown LA. Zimbabwe Ben help me pay my mortgage. No exit! Tax credits! Panem et circenses!

Sunday, April 11, 2010

I'm Back

After a three week IRS and SEC induced layoff, Independent Accountant returns. Thank you readers who expressed concern about my well being.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

IFRS Survey

Tom Selling of Accounting Onion has a survey about IFRS in conjuntion with Pat Walters of Fordham University. Here's a link so you may respond: http://accountingonion.typepad.com/theaccountingonion/2009/10/announcing-our-ifrs-survey.html.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Daily Reviewer

The Daily Reviewer recently listed Skeptical CPA as one of its "Top 100" blogs. I'm in good company: Naked Capitalism, Mish's Global Economic Analysis, Baseline Scenario, Zero Hedge, Calculated Risk and Jesse's Cafe Americain.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

When Giants Fall--Book Review

"Still, acceptance goes only so far. If, for example, you ask Americans how their lives might change when the [US] is no longer the world's military, political, economic, and cultural leader--or even a superpower at all--many will look at you strangely, as if you had two heads. Yet history teaches us that empires come and go. ... In fact, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that the [US'] days as hegemonic leader are already numbered", ix. "But it seems that even those who accept that the world is changing haven't fully thought things through. Typically nowadays, many believe that no matter what happens more broadly speaking, it won't have much impact on their lives. ... And finally, more than a few people have some vague notion that whatever transition does occur will be benign or maybe even positive--akin, perhaps, to what took place many decades ago, when the [US] grabbed the leadership baton from its English-speaking predecessor, Great Britain", my emphasis, x.
"In late 2007, a Chinese submarine suddenly 'popped up' in the middle of US military exercises taking place in the Pacific Ocean. ... The newspaper added--in a report that received scant US media attention--that American military chiefs 'were left dumbstruck'," xv. "Mounting logistical disruptions, tighter borders, heightened geopolitical instability, rising costs of key inputs like water and energy, and an assortment of dislocations will shoot holes in many of the olf theories about how to improve efficiency and boost growth. For most firms, approaches that might once have increased the odds of success, including just-in-time inventory management, the development of long and intricate supply chains, and outsourcing of functions to other locales, will lead to their undoing", my emphasis, xxii.
"Simply put, the [US] has gone soft. People prefer watching or pretending, instead of doing. Education has been dumbed down. According to 'PISA 2006,' the 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a triennnial survey of 15-year-olds around the world, the [US] ranked 29th in science and 35th in mathematics out of 57 countries in terms of overall performance. ... Social standards have slipped. ... Sound arguments are overrun by sound bites, discourse is drowned out by diatribe, and facts and fundamentals are eclipsed by feelings and fantasy", my emphasis, 8.
"What is having a more pronounced effect on the resource supply-demand equation is a structural shift in regional consumption patterns, as populations in fast-growing countries like China and India look to savor the fruits long enjoyed by the [US] and other economically advanced nations. ... But if, for example, China were to reach the same level as the [US], overall rates of consumption would be twice what they are now; if India did the same, the total would be three times as much", 24. "Another concern stems from the so-called demographic tsunami in the [US] and other nations, where the costs of rapidly aging populations are being shouldered by a shrinking number of workers. Such a shortfall lays the groundwork for future generational clashes", my emphasis, 25. "Over the past decade, however, there has been a visible buildup of stresses and bottlenecks signalling a seemingly intractible disparity between supply and demand. ... At the same time many traditional suppliers are making it clear that they no longer wish to play by the rules of what has been a Western-dominated game. ... Such perspectives underscore increasingly widespread acceptance of the concept of 'peak oil'," 27. "During the past four decades or so, global oil consumption has climbed sharply. Based on data from the BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2007, demand rose from 31.2 million barrels a day in 1965 to 83.7 million in 2006, an increase of around 170 percent. Over that span, India's and China's combined share of the total grew eightfold, from 1.5 percent to nearly 12 percent, while the US share fell from 37 percent to just under a quarter of world consumption", my emphasis, 30.
"There's little doubt, of course, that the [US'] military dominance and its formidable nuclear arsenal--as well as other nations' long-standing acceptance of our role as global policeman of last resort--have helped to foster a degree of peace in the postwar period that is unpredecedented. Now, though, with the [US] poised to lose its place at the head of the geopolitical table and the prospect of an intense scramble for key resources, several developments suggest the world is on the cusp of a destabilizing shift in favor of rising violence and more frequent outbreaks of hostilities between individuals, groups, and nations", 44.
"Indeed, no matter how or why the [US] reached this point, there is an argument that says the sizeable dollar claims of a relatively small number of countries actually represent a problem for them, not the [US]", 66.
"Firms that have depended on free-spending American consumers, for example, will find that the structural underpinnings of their business models have been obliterated as incomes drop, attitudes sour, purchasing habits change, and easy credit disappears", 131. "Firms with significant exposure to foreign markets, either directly or indirectly, will also see doubt cast on supply, production, research, and marketing agreements. Paradoxically, energy and mining companies--along with others in seemingly well-positioned industries--could be exposed to dangerous crosscurrents", my emphasis, 133. "Souring municipal finances will also see police budgets slashed, courts overloaded, and crime rates shoot up. Businesses could find that their dependence on computers, telecommunications networks, the Internet, and other components of digital-age plumbing have serious drawbacks when electrical and other systems don't function as intended--or at all", my emphasis, 136. That waiting list for jail grows daily. "Instead of operating on a just-in-time basis, businesses will have to worry about getting enough of what they need--in enough time. Otherwise it won't really matter how efficient they are", 137. "For those operators who are intent on sticking around for a while, the watchword for the future will be a throwback to the past: 'just-in-case' systems", 141.
"Oil-rich countries like Saudi Arabia, for example, which to a great entent maintained structural links to and large portfolios of the [US] currency for strategic purposes, will have much less incentive to do so when the US protective umbrella is in tatters", 149. "Traditional fundamentals may matter less than the question of which firms or industries will benefit from favoritism and government largesse", 156. "Once things get bad enough, however, [policy makers] will turn to other more destructive approaches. These might include cranking up the government printing presses, thereby triggering a hyperinflationary spiral; mandating forced conversions of savings and investments into government bonds; and nationalizing or expropriating businesses", 157. "Some might argue--perhaps convicingly--that equities stand to benefit in a hyperinflationary environment like that which has been seen most recently in the African nation of Zimbabwe", my emphasis, 159.
"Those who have spent years in an office, sitting in front of a computer or pushing paper around, will discover that they have to get their hands dirty doing other, less comfortable tasks", 171-2. "The budgets of state and local governments will be in similarly bad shape. One result will be an ongoing decline in public services such as law enforcement and education. Another will be the shredding of various social and financial safety nets, including Social Security, Medicare, unemployment compensation, and other insurance-type programs", 173.

I agree with the vast majority of what's in Michael Panzner's (MP) book. Most of it I could have written myself. I share MP's concerns about just-in-time inventory for example, and have written about it. Similarly, China's submarine surfacing in the middle of a carrier battle group should have alarmed all Americans. But didn't. The system's lack of slack could lead to lots of bottlenecks. MP and I read many authors in common including: Alan Abelson, Pat Buchanan, Neil Buckley, Jerome Corsi, Niall Ferguson, Martin Hutchinson, Gretchen Morgenson, JR Nyquist, Stephen Roach, Nouriel Roubini and Robert Samuelson. I see one big difference in our worldviews and have a suggestion for MP should he decide to release a second edition of When Giants Fall.

MP notes on page 8 that "Education has been dumbed down". He offers no explanation for this. He should. The generational clashes described on page 25 were the subject of Kotlikoff and Burns, The Coming Generational Storm, 2005, which should be added to MP's bibliography.
Page 30 has a common error, confusing consumption with demand. This is the only error I found in the book.
I share MP's concerns about the dollar and Saudi Arabia's potential actions with respect to it. I am bullish on the market except for financials. I see hyperinflation wiping out corporate debt, which will benefit equity holders.
MP's comment at 171-2 is Austrian, i.e., as malinvestments are revealed the system's "rounaboutness" will decrease. Farmers should do fine in the collapse. They did well in the German hyperinflation of 1922-23, for example.
Now a deficiency, MP's apparent unfamilarity with the "IQ and economics" literature from Lynn and Vanhannen, IQ & Global Inequality, 2006 and IQ and the Wealth of Nations, 2002. Anyone interested in a major, perhaps the major source of global per capita GDP differences should read these books as well as the La Griffe du Lion website. While many academicians may scream, eventually America will give up trying to equalize incomes by race or we will bankrupt ourselves. We have spent 45 years on this quixotic quest and after perhaps $10 trillion in 2009 dollars, should give it up. Africa is poorer than say Japan. Africa's average IQ is 69, Japan's, 104, and there ain't nuttin' anybody can do about it.

Overall, MP rings the tocsin. Ignore his comments at your peril. Spend the time, read, wake up America.

Friday, May 15, 2009

War of the World

I recently read War of the World, 2006, by Niall Ferguson (NF), a Harvard history professor. NF's thesis is: the 20th Century's various wars were part of a worldwide power shift from the West to the East. NF's thesis is provocative to say the least. His book is full of obscure historical facts I had not encountered before and is worth reading. NF is vaguely reminiscent of Oswald Spengler who wrote The Decline of the West, 1922.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Tick Marks

Dan Meyer, Tennesse accounting professor, writes Tick Mark, link: http://tickmarks.blogspot.com/. His 10 December 2008 post reads in part, "In a closely matched field of eight, (the nominees plus David Albrecht's 'The Summa'), the four accounting blogs chosen for the 'Twelve Blogs of Christmas' are: CPA Firm Leaders Blog (Rita Keller), FEI SOX Blog (Edith Ornstein), re: the Auditors (Francine McKenna) and the Skeptical Accountant (anonymous male from Texas). ... The Skeptical Accountant is a hard-nosed libertarian male with no use for sloppy economic practice--regardless of who is responsible. Two top recent posts include 'Oil Supply' and 'The Bloodless Coup Continues-6'."

Thanks Professor Meyer. I think your description of me as a "hard-nosed libertarian male" is more accurate than as a leftist.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Wikinvest Links

I summarized my Wikinvest links from 11 to 27 November 2008 with this result:

45 Naked Capitalism
09 Contrarian Profits
08 Credit Writedowns
08 Fund my Mutual Fund
35 All other links

Interesting.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Ben Franklin-2

My 6 November 2008 post, "Ben Franklin Was Right", http://skepticaltexascpa.blogspot.com/2008/11/ben-franklin-was-right.html, apparently ruffled some high-placed feathers. It attracted a record number of: "reads" for a Skeptical CPA post, 2,174 and comments, 22. IA may have joined Pat Buchanan's "peasants with pitchforks" brigade. If not, sign me up Pat. Teresa Ghilarducci's (TG) plan to end 401(k) plans as we know them is public record. Rush Limbaugh (Rush), with about 20 million weekly listeners discussed it! Mark Levin's (ML) 16-minute interview is a gem. Listen to it. It seems our learned professor spent too long in the academy and is not used to being cross examined by a clear intellectual better who is not dependent upon her for a grade! Enjoy, have some laughs at a "hackademic's" expense. ML has about 2.5 million weekly listeners.

Reuters 5 November 2008 article quotes TG as saying, George Miller "wants to make 401(k)s better. He doesn't want to kill the tax deduction. In my favor, he agrees I brought up genuinely credible criticisms of the 401(k) tax break as it exists now". The link: http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USTRE4A49UV20081105. Isn't this dandy? Miller doesn't want to "kill the tax deduction" now. Wait until next year as New York Mets fans used to say. Did Miller get more flak over this than he anticipated and will wait to introduce a bill to kill the 401(k) tax deduction next year? What makes TG's plan transparent is: anyone who wants to put Treasury paper, either conventional or TIPS in his 401(k) can do so now. TG's plan is: seize your 401(k) assets and give you a piece of Uncle Sam's paper which he will hyperinflate out of existence at his leisure.

The Los Angeles Times, 9 November 2008, article by James Rainey (JR) attacked "El Rushbo" for his attack on Obama. JR in my opinion, is a left-wing Obamacon, economic ignoramus, who is incapable of making an argument, only ad hominem attacks. The relevant portion of JR's article, "In a time when the nation calls out for cool leadership and rational discussion, Limbaugh stirs the cauldron, a tendency he proved in a particularly grotesque way last week when he accused Obama's party of plotting a government takeover of 401(k) plans. 'They're going to take your 401(k), put it in the Social Security trust fund, whatever the hell that is,' Limbaugh woofed. 'Trust fund, my rear end.' A slight problem with Limbaugh's report: Obama and the Democrats have proposed no such thing. The proposal, in fact, emanated from a single economist, one of many experts testifying to a congressional committee. ... To broadcast such a report--so drained of context as to constitute a lie--would be a shameless act at any time. But Limbaugh needlessly stirred the fears of millions he holds in his thrall--making the 401(k) thievery sound like a done deal. Shameless", my emphasis. Link: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-onthemedia9-2008nov09,0,4216330.story. JR, didn't the Democrats have TG testify to fly their trial balloon? What do you think happened with say, 1996's Boskin Commission? Coincidence, I don't think so.

I followed about a dozen blog posts which described TG's plan. The majority referred back to the Workforce article I mentioned on 6 November.

Anonymous', 7 November 2008 comment launched this post, "I'm a constituent of Congressman Jim McDermott's, and I got in touch with his office after reading this. They told me in no uncertain terms that this is a false story, that Congressman McDermott is considering no such proposal, and that the 'quotes' from Congressman McDermott in various versions of this story are fabrications. If you'd like to check with his office and verify this yourself, you can reach them at: 206-553-7170. I look forward to seeing a prominent correction". Well anonymous, you ain't gettin' it. Who do you think you are? Dostoyevsky's Grand Inquisitor? I realize my posts are legal hearsay since I am not an "ear" witness to McDermott's statements. However, he never had any publication they appeared in retract them. What will you, yes you anonymous, do about it? Who did you speak to in McDermott's office? I offer McDermott a deal. If he flies here to Houston, at his expense, I will depose him and pay for the court reporter then post a deposition transcript at this blog. Let the readers decide who's lying and when.

"All of the issues the foes on Capitol Hill are considering are very troubling, especially Rep. George Miller's even considering the government's taking over 401(k)s. Are we in Argentina?", Thomas Edwards letter to the WSJ, 13 November 2008.

"You may have heard about Argentina's plan to nationalize private retirement accounts. Some Democrats on Capitol Hill are inspired, and with their big election victory they may get the chance to test Peronist ideas in America. Meet Congressmen George Miller and Jim McDermott, who are eager to change the way Americans save for their golden years. ... Before Election Day, the Congressmen began to target the $3 trillion in 401(k) accounts held by 60% of Americans. Mr. Miller called the system 'an inadequate vehicle' that has not been terribly sucessful' in encouraging retirement savings. He wants a 'wholesale re-examination' of pensions. ... But the Chairman has also signalled greater ambitions. At a hearing last month, Mr. Miller put the 401(k) system into play. Under the current system, employers match employee contributions that aren't taxed until redeemed, an indirect subsidy worth some $80 billion today. 'We have to start to think about in Congress ... whether or not we want to continue to invest that $80 billion for a policy that's not generating what we now say it should,' Mr. Miller said. 'For a taxpayer investment of this size, we must ensure that the structure of 401(k)s adequately protects the nest eggs of participating workers.' ... Most eye-catching was an idea from Teresa Ghilarducci at New York's New School for Social Research. ... A McDermott spokesman called her proposals 'intriguing' and 'part of the discussion.' Mr. Miller hasn't so far endorsed the plan. ... Anger over the drop in 401(k) balances is one reason that voters who belong to the 'investor class' swung to Democrats in greater than usual numbers this year. Their mandate is for policies that improve those returns, not strip them of tax benefits", Editorial at the WSJ, 14 November 2008.

"Allow me to repeat my position on 401(k)s, which you mischaraterize in your Nov. 6 'Obama's Real Opposition' and Nov. 14 'Targeting Your 401(k)' editorials. I do not support abolishing 401(k)s, forcing these plans into government programs, or changing their tax status. We must preserve and strengthen 401(k)s, not end them. ... That is why I support strong fee disclosure and other measures to increase participation in 401(k) plans", George Miller letter to the WSJ, 18 November 2008.

Some more links to look at:

US News & World Report, 23 October 2008 by James Pethokoukis (JP). JP quotes Jim McDermott as saying, "the savings rate isn't going up for the investment of $80 billion [in 401(k) tax breaks], we have to start to think about whether or not we want to continue to invest that $80 billion for a policy that's not generating what we now say it should". http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/10/23/would-obama-dems-kill-401k-plans.html.




On 13 November 2008 I went to Jim McDermott's (JM) website and did not find any mention of TG's plan. I did find that JM voted against the bailout bill. Thank you JM for that.

Yes, Edwards, we are in Argentina. Hyperinflation is coming!

In reading the WSJ's editorial I anticipated the words as I read them. Had the WSJ asked me, I could have written it as an op-ed.

This is what you say now Rep. Miller. Why did TG testify at your hearings? When will you tell us "circumstances have changed. We must nationalize your 401(k)s for the public good"? This looks like setting up Joe Schmoe for the coming nationalization.

At Skeptical CPA we are not afraid to draw conclusions from facts. IA surmises after Obama was elected someone in the "Office of the President-Elect" became aware of this proposal floating around Congress. This Obamacon, whoever he is, told Miller, McDermott and anyone else pushing it something to the effect, "Obama got about 80% of Wall Street's campaign contributions. Do you realize that even at 50 basis points a year, with $3 trillion in 401(k)s, to adopt Ghillarducci's plan would take $15 billion a year from Obama's constituents? Do you understand that?" And now the TG plan pushers are running from their own Frankenstein monster. At least that's how it looks from here.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Wikinvest

I recently received a Wikinvest invitation and saw it works well on Naked Capitalism and Financial Armageddon so added the plug-in.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Blog Review

On 3 November 2008, I got an e-mail from Mikal Belicove, http://www.belicove.com/. It read in part, "My name is Mikal Belicove and I an one of the co-authors if the '2009 Internet Directory: Web 2.0 Edition' (ISBN: 0789738163). I thought you would like to know that I reviewed you blog and named it the 'Best' blog in the Accounting category for my new book. With this is mind, I am writing to see if you would be interested in receiving an icon to put on your blog related to this reference. ... The directory is now available on Amazon and through bookstores nationwide, if you're interested".

I bought the book from Amazon; page six says of Skeptical CPA, "This blog, written by an independent CPA, covers many topics relevant to accounting, from banking to taxes. The blogger shares what he has learned through trial and error, so you can learn from his mistakes".

Thank you Mikal. Yes, I'm independent. Very. No one tells me what to think.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Book Review: Walter Wriston's Bits, Bytes, and

"The Internet has changed everything", xv. "To get 'it' means more than just having a personal computer on your desk or going to conferences with PowerPoint presentations. It is a mind-set", xvi. "Just as the landed gentry gave way to the industrialists as the Industrial Revolution gained momentum, so today the industrialists have been replaced by the master of intellectual capital", xvii. "The law of unintended consequences was at work with the the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley bill in 2002. ... The overregulation that surely will result is partly the fault of business itself because practices that are often overlooked in boom times may, in lean times, appear to be egregious excesses that should never have been allowed to happen", 1. " "With the passage of time, the regulators produce a plethora of regulations that have the force of law, and an administrative judge--often from the same regulatory body--becomes prosecutor, judge and jury. Inevitably, the regulator substitutes his or her judgment for that of the market, and the system becomes backward-looking at a time when worldwide competition requires forward-looking innovation to survive. In the banking sector, for years the regulators held below market the interest rate that banks could pay to consumers", 2. "[I]f regulations continue to point in that direction [greater liability], it will become difficult, if not impossible, to get anyone of substance to serve on a board of directors", 3. "In the United States, thousands of manufacturing jobs that were once a mainstay of our society are never going to come back, nor will we ever see the American farms employing the approximately 20 million people who worked on them as the beginning of the twentieth century", 8.
"Over the years, wealth--and the perception of what constitutes it--has changed dramatically", 14. "What is wealth? How is it generated, used and saved?", 15. "Since only about 2 percent of a microchip is material cost, material resources are no longer very important as sources of wealth. ... The new economic powerhouses are masters not of huge material resources but of ideas and technology", 17. "The shift to the new economy has given new prominence to what John Maynard Keynes called the 'symbol' economy as opposed to the 'real' economy", 21. "Wealth is being created not by making and selling things, although this is still a large part of the economy, but by taking, trading, and managing risk in the financial sector. ... The idea of breaking down every risk into smaller and smaller parts was given the name 'particle finance,' and modern technology is giving us the means to do so", my emphasis, 23.
"It is almost a truism that although history is made up of facts, facts do not make history. Facts, no matter how prolix, do not arrange themselves into useful knowledge", 28. "For example, when natural resources were the dominant factor of production, the conquest and control of territory seemed a reliable way to enhance national power", 37. Today, infomation technology permit just-in-time inventory with direct shipments from supplier to store in response to signals created by the cash registers at the store's checkout counter", 38. "The economy ... has created what I call the Information Standard, which is far more draconian that the old gold standard and operates more swiftly", 40. "There is still no substitute for courage and leadership", 55.
"It is fair to say that no economy has ever behaved in a totally predictable manner; otherwise, the pundits would not be wrong so often", 57. "Until very recently, governments retained substantial power to manipulate the value of their currencies", 58. "Today, the value of any currency is determined by the price that the market will pay for it in exchange for some other currency", 59.
"People all over the globe see and hear how others live and work, and no one has to tell them that command and control economics do not work", 69. "There are large public-policy issues raised by the new technology that touch upon a sovereign nation's monopoly on the issuance and control of money", 80-81. The gold-silver standard and ratio between them, was an "inflexible system [that] led to panics and instability", 81. "There is very little, if any evidence that government has managed our currency values as well as did the commercial banks in the pre-Federal Reserve days", 81-82. "How can we control counterfeiting in cyberspace? What will happen if the issuer of the [debit] card goes broke?", 82. "Banks have always been good at assessing risk because the management of risk is what the banking business is all about", my emphasis, 88.
"American Enterprise Institute scholar Nicholas Eberstadt writes: 'Where unshakable traditional beliefs or passing superstitions played official roles in the past, we now witness overconfidence based on a false precision. ... Where antique despots surrendered to the temptations of numerology, the modern statesman proudly succumbs to the allure of "quantophrenia"--an idolatry of numbers no less unreasoning, and no less poorly suited for promoting the commonweal, than its precursor'," 92-93. "On another front, everyone from Main Street to Wall Street watched the inflation numbers. ... [The Boskin Commission] reported that the CPI overstated the change in the cost of living by about 1.1 percentage points per year. ... For example, instead of falling by 13 percent, real hourly wages actually rose by 13 percent from 1973 to 1995", 96. "Banks, which like to have collateral for their loans, are increasingly faced with the dilemma of what constitutes good collateral", 102.
"There is clearly a massive disconnect between corporate accounting and the value the market puts on a corporation's stock", 109. "To survive and prosper in the new economy, companies must now compete for the men and women with brains", 111.
"The Black-Scholes model, such as it is, is designed for short-term, tradable options and rests on a series of assumptions, some about the unknowable future, which must be imputed into the model", 114.
"With the plaintiffs' bar pouring money into the coffers of Congress and with the pressure to pass laws, the concept of a limited liability corporation, which has fueled the expansion of our economy, is in jeopardy", 119.
"The hunt for scapegoats heats up at the end of every financial cycle when markets start to decline and paper profits disappear", 121. "The basic problem is simple: Do the men and women who manage companies around the world have the necessary integrity?", 122. "The first lines of defense are honest law enforcement officers and effective auditors", 123.

The numbers above are page references. Walter Wriston (WW), 1919-2005, wrote Bits, Bytes, And Balance Sheets, 2007, piecemeal. It is a collection of his speeches and articles by Kathryn Wriston, his widow, after WW's death. As for regulators suppressing interest rates to consumers, that was done to aid banks. I don't recollect banks complaining about it until money market funds were created. Do we see Vikram Pandit, current Citigroup CEO, screaming interest rates are too low and that bank account holders are being "euthanized" after taxes and inflation? I have heard many times, how difficult it is to get competant people to serve on BODs. Really? I'll chair Citigroup's current audit committee. I'm sure Citigroup's senior management, accountants and KPMG will dislike the questions I'll ask, but I'm ready. I disagree, manufacturing, mining and agriculture are where it's at as American living standards decline. I agree, we will never see 20 milllion people back on US farms.
I agree, if in 1910 you would have told people fiat dollars were wealth as well as Euros, krona, etc., people would have laughed. Excellent question: what is wealth? That 2% of a microchip's value is material cost strikes me as no more relevant than what percent is the material "cost" of a barrel of oil. Oil's cost of material means what? The cost of: drilling mud, dry holes, tool pusher labor, what? I agree, the "symbol" economy will collapse under higher US inflation rates, when the world's central banks stop supporting the dollar. This get a "res ipsa loquitur". Imagine, WW was Citigroup's chairman. I'm surprised he never nominated any of his financial engineers for a Nobel Prize. In Physics!
So? Aren't natural resources a "dominant factor of production" today? As long as you have no transportation bottlenecks. More "draconian"? More "swiftly", to do what? "No substitute"? How about cunning, guile and obfuscation?
I agree, it's tough to predict the future. So? Until? Then why does China have $1.9 trillion in foreign exchange reserves? Yes, the Fed has done worse than the the market.
I agree, they don't work. Does anyone recollect WW advocating repeal of the Federal Reserve Act? Maybe the world is overdue to accept von Hayek's 1976 suggestion: we need free choice in currencies. Maybe we don't need any government to "control money". Is WW serious? It was unsound fractional-reserve banking practices that led to "panics and instability". Not gold and silver. Why punish counterfeiting, is the Fed afraid of competiton? Seriously, I have long believed that such counterfeiting would be concealed lest people lose faith in the "system". "Stuff and nonsense", said Alice. The business of banking is having bank depositors absorb risk and not get compensated for it. Banking under fiat money is a scam. Banks "good at assessing risk"? As The Mogambo Guru would say, "Hahahahaha"! If politicians did not protect them, most banks would collapse.
Amen, see my 12 December 2007 post mentioning Oskar Morgenstern. I agree with John Williams of shadowstats, about the Boskin Commission. It was another scam. I didn't know banks like to hold collateral. That's so 19th century.
I agree. So? I would never have guessed brains are useful.
I agree with WW, Black-Scholes (BS) is not that useful. Further, the 1973 Nobel Prize to Wassily Leontief and 1997 to Merton and Scholes as the two worst awards of its type. That said, I think options have a cost, which should be reflected in earnings per share. If BS is the best we have, use it.
The reestablishment of personal liability for bankers managing institutions which hold federally insured deposits is long overdue. I agree with Jefferson, corporations are dangerous. They can be used to redistribute wealth. And are. That's a fair slice of private-equity and LBO shops returns, i.e., "cutting off the left tail" and leaving it to other creditors. WW advocates adopting International Accounting Standards, 120. I don't and just see than as tools for manipulation. I wonder if WW, wherever he is, feels the plaintiffs' bar has done as much damage to the US taxpayer as say the managements of: Goldman Sachs, Freddie, Fannie, Bear, etc., etc.?
So? Integrity is a problem, but I see the integrity of the regulators as a bigger problem. Does Citigroup really want an "honest", KPMG, SEC and SDNY US Attorney's office?

Save your time and $25. Read something else. Whenever I think of WW, I think of something he said, "Countries don't go bust". They sure do. Imagine, WW was the chairman of Citigroup. Think about that!

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Happy Sputnik Day

Sputnik 1 was launched 4 October 1957, 51 years ago today. Sputnik is the first major news story I followed after learning to read on or about 17 September 1957. It fascinated me so much I read all I could about: astronomy, rocketry and the "IGY". IGY? International Geophysical Year, 1957-58. I remember when the American public made Werner von Braun, 1912-1977, a "rock star". Now we follow the antics of that drunken fool Paris Hilton. We passed 1958's NDEA, National Defense Education Act, which Admiral Hyman Rickover, 1900-86 pushed. Now we have No Child Left Behind. In 1961 JFK gave a speech announcing we would land on the moon by 1970. And so we did. What's happened since? In 1969 I figured we would have landed on Mars by 1980 and had a permanent moon base by 1990. Didn't happen. Instead we've "lost" at least 25 years of scientific advancement. Look at where we've gone and what we've done in the last fifty years. Amazing!

Monday, September 22, 2008

The WSJ Returns

Today, 22 September 2008, no, not a date "which will live in infamy", I had my first WSJ copy delivered since 11 September 2008. We've had an "unpleasantness" here in Houston, known as Ike and I've largely been "out of the loop".

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

MBA Explorer

MBA Explorer, a blog about MBAs and their schools, recently posted a list of the "Top 50 Accounting Blogs", which included Skeptical CPA. Here's a link to the website: http://www.mbaexplorer.com/. Thanks, Christina Laun.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

"Kill All the Lenders"

"The business of Wall Street is to introduce people who should not borrow to people who should not lend, collecting fees from both parties. It's a good business as long as everyone keeps a straight face. In the last few years, it got to be too good a business: It came to be the business of Main Street as well. ... All we need is some new courthouses to hold the foreclosure papers and proceedings on a couple of million American houses. The sooner the banks own them, the sooner they can be resold on realistic terms", Thomas Donlan (TD) at Barron's, 10 December.

"Let me argue why monetary policy easing--not just palliatives such as the liquidity injections announced by central banks this week but rather significant cuts in policy rates--are now necessary and warranted. ... First of all, as argued here since August, the current global financial crisis is due to insolvency on top of illiquidity. ... The job of a central bank is not to bail out the financial system and/or investors but that of bailing out the real economy. Having millions of workers lose their jobs ... does not make sense. ... And inflicting severe misery and pain and collateral damage on innocent bystanders ... is not sound economic policy. ... Third issue: would monetary easing cause a much higher inflation rate and undermine the anti-inflation policy of the central banks? After all inflation rates are now rising around the world thanks to high and rising oil, energy, food and other commodities. ... This is the most severe financial crisis that the global economy has experienced in the last few decades. But so far central banks have been deluding themselves that this is a temporary run-of-the-mill liquidity shock", Nouriel Roubini (NR) at http://www.rgemonitor.com/, 15 December.

I was in grammar school in the 1950s. Weekly we got My Weekly Reader (MWR), for a nickel! MWR exposed us to the Fed as seven-year olds! MWR taught that many South American countries were corrupt as they had 20-35% inflation rates because of their unwillingness or inability to balance their budgets. MWR did not teach monetarism, but I conclude its' writers knew more economics than Helicopter Ben (HB). MWR's writers thought the Fed's primary job was to mantain the dollar's value in the foreign exchange markets and that we were lucky to have a responsible central bank like the Fed unlike those of South Americans. HB has a choice, destroy the dollar or let the market destroy the banks. It's that simple.

NR is honest to admit his is an advocacy piece. I agree, there are insolvent actors in the market. My questions to NR are: who are they? What does bailing out "the real economy" mean? Who is helped, who is hurt? Whether or not "having millions of workers lose their jobs" makes sense depends on who they are. I believe having say, 100 to 200 thousand Wall Streeters lose their jobs makes sense. Having say, 300,000 mortgage bankers lose jobs makes sense. Is destroying millions of Americans' life savings through inflation to protect the banks "sound economic policy"? What "anti-inflation policy of the central banks" is NR aware of? If Milton Friedman established anything it is: inflation is a monetary phenomenon. NR confuses central bank rhetoric and actions. They are not "deluding themselves" at all. They will print all the money the large banks need. Got gold? Get more.

Addendum: Mike Shedlock (MS) had a post on NR's post at Mish on 18 December agreeing with me. MS notes he checks his opinions against NR's to see if he may be wrong. So do I.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Blog Readability

I came across www.criticsrant.com/bb/reading_level.aspx, "Blog Readability Test" in my internet ramblings. Out of curiosity of what it was I ran it on Skeptical CPA and the blogs it links to with these results:

American Thinker, Genius H
Asia Times, Genius
Becker-Posner, Genius
Gene Expression, High School WTL
George Borjas, College-Undergrad
Intellectual Conservative, College-Undergrad
Lew Rockwell, Elementary School WTL
Ludwig Von Mises, High School L
Overcoming Bias, College-Postgrad
Real Clear Politics, High School
TCS Daily, College-Undergrad
Townhall, High School
V Dare, High School
Calculated Risk, College-Undergrad
Doctor Housing Bubble, Junior High School
Financial Sense, College-Undergrad
Gold Eagle, Junior High School L
Kitco, Elementary School WTL
Naked Capitalism, College-Undergrad
Prudent Bear, Genius H
Re: The Auditors, College-Undergrad
RGE Monitor, Genius
The Gold Bug, Junior High School L
W.C. Varones, College-Postgrad

Skeptical CPA, College-Postgrad

I was surprised with how well the algorithim this website uses to acess readability agrees with my opinions. 68% or 17 of 25 results I agreed with; finding: 3, too low, signified by L, 2 too high, signified by H and 3, way too low, signified by WTL. I believe Gene Expression has the highest required education level of any blog I follow. Overall, a good job by blog readability test.

Friday, October 5, 2007

An Old Voice Still Speaks

In 1980 I read a book titled The Warmongers, by Howard Katz. It's a gem. If you get a chance to read it, you should. I recently found Howard Katz has his blog, The Gold Bug, which I linked to. It too is worth a look.

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Hello

This is my first post. From time-to-time I will post comments about: the war on terrorism, as it is, money, investments, religion and other bloggers.