"The political roots of the UK government's decision to bar talk show host [MS] have been revealed for the world to see, thanks to a freedom of information lawsuit in Britain that caused Home Office documents on the subject to be made public. We now know that political considerations--the need to placate Muslims, a powerful voting bloc--resulted in a search for someone to 'provide a balance of types of exclusion cases.' ... Certainly, if one is appeasing Muslim extremists, whose violent reaction was supposedly feared should Savage set foot in the UK, then a Jew makes the best fall guy, as everyone from Hitler to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem would agree. ... The US media has studiously ignored the story", original italics, Thomas Lifson, 25 July 2009 at: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/brit_ban_on_savage_was_pure_po.html.
"When I first heard that radio host [MS] had been banned from traveling to England along with an assortment of Moslem terrorists and other miscreants, my first thought was that the public relations arm of the politically corrent thought police had struck again. It only made sense. ... Yet the spineless Neville Chamberlain bureaucrats charged with this task--whose credo seems to be 'peace through capitulation'--would never want to be seen as singling out Moslems. So they traded a man's reputation for peace in our time. ... You may rest secure in the knowledge that you're not as controversial as Savage, but understand the implications of quota selection. Whether you're favoring a person or persecuting him, the standard is the same: you're selecting him not based on what he has done but what he is", Selwyn Duke 27 July 2009, link: http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/07/27/britannia-ruled-by-knaves-savage-banned%20to-fill-white-man-quota/.
Quoted without comment.